I’ve been meaning to comment on this since a friend sent it to me last week. I’m sure most of my vegan readers have seen this by now (i’ve now seen it in 3 or 4 vegan blogs and forums). But for those of you who haven’t, go read ‘Soy is making kids gay‘, published in the World Net Daily. There is so much ridiculous stuff to respond to that i don’t know where to begin. A lot of it speaks for itself, so i’ll leave it untouched. But i’m a little confused.
Yes, soy (like many of the other plant-based foods) serves as a natural form of estrogen. This natural endocrine works to slightly increase the estrogen levels in bodies with higher testoterone count and decreases the amount of estrogen in estrogen-rich bodies. No arguements there. That’s just the beauty of science. But i’m confused as to where this guy’s research is that shows that it is an increase in estrogen that makes someone gay. Because i’m willing to bet that if there is any research on this subject, it will show this claim to be false. But alas, he doesn’t cite his sources.
But the part that really has me confused is the assumption that sexuality is directly correlated to hormone count. So estrogen is naturally attracted to testosterone. If this is the case, wouldn’t male-male relationships require that one of them had a high estrogen count and the other a high testosterone count? And if this is the case, is the one with the high testosterone count still heterosexual? And if both of them have a high estrogen count, does this mean they are actually lesbians?
Sorry ridiculous questions for a ridiculous theory.
Of course, the part that makes you realize this article is a bunch of homophobic crap, is the first line: “There’s a slow poison out there that’s severely damaging our children and threatening to tear apart our culture.” That’s right, homosexuality is damaging our children and tearing apart our culture. I’m not familiar with WND, but looking at their other article titles, i’m guessing they are a right-wing Christian publication. So its no surprise that they would print such rubbish.
I just wanted to share one more part of the article: “If your baby gets colic from cow’s milk, do you switch him to soy milk? Don’t even think about it. His phytoestrogen level will jump to 20 times normal. If he is a she, brace yourself for watching her reach menarche as young as seven, robbing her of years of childhood. If he is a boy, it’s far worse: He may not reach puberty till much later than normal.” Please stop, my side hurts! I agree that babies aren’t supposed to be fed soy products (although we disagree on the reasons), but research has also shown they aren’t supposed to be fed cow’s milk. But i’m curious what his option is if the baby does get colic from cow’s milk. Let them starve! Death is better than homosexuality! And i like how there is a perfect window for puberty. And that its soy (not the far more damaging endocrine disruptors found in such products as factory-farmed milk) that are causing wimmin to reach puberty at an earlier age. And why is it that its “far worse” for a guy’s puberty schedule to be off-set than a womyn’s? hmm… i’ll try not to think about it too hard.
Ok, just wanted to share the laughs with you.





